On March 23, 2007 11:06:33 PM -0700 Adam Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:28:19AM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
> I'm in a way still hoping that it's a iSCSI related Problem as
> detecting dead hosts in a network can be a non trivial problem and it
> takes quite some time for TCP to timeout and inform the upper layers.
> Just a guess/hope here that FC-AL, ... do better in this case
iscsi doesn't use TCP, does it? Anyway, the problem is really transport
independent.
It does use TCP. Were you thinking UDP?
or its own IP protocol. I wouldn't have thought iSCSI would want to be
subject to the vagaries of TCP.
-frank
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
