okay so since this is fixed, Chris, would you consider using USB/FW now?
I am desperate to replace a server that is failing and I want to replace it with a proper quiet ZFS-based solution, I hate being held captive by NTFS issues (it may have corrupted my data now a second time) ZFS's checksumming + storage pooling is what I want to get going. If anyone else has ideas for quiet easily expandable storage I'd be willing to listen to any ideas. Off-list is fine as is on-list. On 3/20/07, Phi Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This bug has been fixed in NV54. Phi
>> Until it is fixed, I wouldn't even consider using ZFS on USB storage. >> Even so, not all bridge boards (Firewire included) implement this >> command. Unless you can verify that it functions correctly, it is >> safer to avoid USB and Firewire all together, as you risk serious >> corruption in the event of a power loss. This holds true for any >> filesystem.
>> Another good reason is that scrubs and rebuilds will take a long time. >> Unfortunately, I don't think that port multipliers are yet supported >> in the SATA framework, so probably the best bet is a large enclosure >> with internal SATA disks.
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss