okay so since this is fixed, Chris, would you consider using USB/FW now?

I am desperate to replace a server that is failing and I want to
replace it with a proper quiet ZFS-based solution, I hate being held
captive by NTFS issues (it may have corrupted my data now a second
time)

ZFS's checksumming + storage pooling is what I want to get going. If
anyone else has ideas for quiet easily expandable storage I'd be
willing to listen to any ideas. Off-list is fine as is on-list.

On 3/20/07, Phi Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This bug has been fixed in NV54.

Phi

>> Until it is fixed, I wouldn't even consider using ZFS on USB storage.
>> Even so, not all bridge boards (Firewire included) implement this
>> command.  Unless you can verify that it functions correctly, it is
>> safer to avoid USB and Firewire all together, as you risk serious
>> corruption in the event of a power loss.  This holds true for any
>> filesystem.

>> Another good reason is that scrubs and rebuilds will take a long time.
>> Unfortunately, I don't think that port multipliers are yet supported
>> in the SATA framework, so probably the best bet is a large enclosure
>> with internal SATA disks.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to