Sorry to insist but I am not aware of a small file problem with ZFS (which doesn't mean there isn't one, nor that we agree on definition of 'problem'). So if anyone has data on this topic, I'm interested.
Also note, ZFS does a lot more than VxFS. -r Claude Teissedre writes: > Hello Roch, > > Thanks for your reply. According to Iozone and Filebench > (http://blogs.sun.com/dom/), ZFS is less performant than VxFS for smalll > files and more performant for large files. In you blog, I don't see > specific infos related to small files -but it's a very interesting blog. > > Any help from CC: people related to Perforce benchmark (not in > techtracker) is welcome. > > Thanks, > Clausde > > Roch - PAE a écrit : > > Salut Claude. > > For this kind of query, try zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; > > Looks like a common workload to me. > > I know of no small file problem with ZFS. > > You might want to state your metric of success ? > > > > -r > > > > Claude Teissedre writes: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am looking for any benchmark of Perforce on ZFS. > > > My need here is specifically for Perforce, a source manager. At my ISV, > > it handles 250 users simustaneously (15 instances on average) > > > and 16 Millions (small) files. That's an area not covered in the > > benchmaks I have seen. > > > > > > Thanks, Claude > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
