Hello Leon, Sunday, February 11, 2007, 5:53:48 PM, you wrote:
LK> Jeff, LK> thank you for the explanation but it's hard to me to accept it because: LK> 1.You described a different configuration: 7 LUNs. Marion post LK> was about 7 slices of the same LUN. LK> 2.I never saw the storage controller with cache-per-LUN setting. LK> Cache size doesn't depend on number of LUNs IMHO, it's a fixed LK> size per controller or per FC port, LK> SAN-experts-please-fix-me-if-I'm-wrong. IIRC Symmetrix boxes used to at least reserve minimum amount of cache per LUN basis. However it's not relevant to your case as you are talking about: entire LUN vs. 7 slices on the LUN in a striped pool. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
