hey, thanks for your overwhelming private lesson for english colloquialism :D
now back to the technical :) > # zfs create pool/gzip > # zfs set compression=gzip pool/gzip > # cp -r /pool/lzjb/* /pool/gzip > # zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > pool/gzip 64.9M 33.2G 64.9M /pool/gzip > pool/lzjb 128M 33.2G 128M /pool/lzjb > > That's with a 1.2G crash dump (pretty much the most compressible file > imaginable). Here are the compression ratios with a pile of ELF binaries > (/usr/bin and /usr/lib): > # zfs get compressratio > NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE > pool/gzip compressratio 3.27x - > pool/lzjb compressratio 1.89x - this looks MUCH better than i would have ever expected for smaller files. any real-world data how good or bad compressratio goes with lots of very small but good compressible files , for example some (evil for those solaris evangelists) untarred linux-source tree ? i'm rather excited how effective gzip will compress here. for comparison: sun1:/comptest # bzcat /tmp/linux-2.6.19.2.tar.bz2 |tar xvf - --snipp-- sun1:/comptest # du -s -k * 143895 linux-2.6.19.2 1 pax_global_header sun1:/comptest # du -s -k --apparent-size * 224282 linux-2.6.19.2 1 pax_global_header sun1:/comptest # zfs get compressratio comptest NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE comptest tank compressratio 1.79x - This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss