Hello,

Am 24.1.2007 14:49 Uhr, Jason Banham schrieb:

> The panic looks due to the fact that your SVM state databases aren't
> all there, so when we came to update one of them we found there
> was <= 50% of the state databases and crashed.

The metadbs are fine. I haven't touched them at all:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] # metadb
        flags           first blk       block count
     a m  p  luo        16              8192            /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7
     a    p  luo        8208            8192            /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7
     a    p  luo        16              8192            /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s7
     a    p  luo        8208            8192            /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s7

> This doesn't look like anything to do with ZFS.
> I'd check the output from metadb and see if it looks like
> you've got a SVM database on a disk that's also in use by ZFS.

The question is still, why the system is panicing? I pulled out now a
different this, which is for sure on ZFS and not on SVM. The system
still runs, but I can't login anymore and the console doesn't work at
all anymore. Even if it has nothing to do with zfs, I don't think this
is a normal behavior.


Ihsan


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://ihsan.dogan.ch/
                        http://gallery.dogan.ch/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to