On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:07:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote: > Hello Zoram, > > Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 11:27:48 AM, you wrote: > > ZT> Hi Ceri, > > ZT> I just saw your mail today. I'm replying In case you haven't found a > ZT> solution. > > ZT> This is > > ZT> 6475304 zfs core dumps when trying to create new spool using "did" device > > ZT> The workaround suggests: > > ZT> Set environmental variable > > ZT> NOINUSE_CHECK=1 > > ZT> And the problem does not exists. > > Of course the question is why use ZFS over DID?
Actually the question is probably: why shouldn't I? I can fall back
to the real device name, but d8 is a lot easier to remember than
c1t0100000CF1F459EE00002A0045AF6B6Ed0 and has the advantage of being
guaranteed to be the same across all nodes.
What's the disadvantage?
> However it should not have core dumped.
Yep, that's why I posted :)
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
pgpeb1YoZbZcA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
