Hello Rainer, Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 5:02:01 PM, you wrote:
RH> scenario. Due to the number of files, UFS was not an option. Since RH> the environment is going to RAC in six months, upgrading Veritas RH> did not seem like a justifiable option, with the (mistaken?) RH> belief ZFS performance would be more than adequate. What do you mean by UFS wasn't an option due to number of files? Also do you have any tunables in system? Can you send 'zpool status' output? (raidz, mirror, ...?) "When the DBA’s do clones" - you mean that by just doing 'zfs clone ...' you get big performance problem? OR maybe just before when you do 'zfs snapshot' first? How much free space is left in a pool? Do you have sar data when problems occured? Any paging in a system? And one advise - before any more testing I would definitely upgrade/reinstall system to U3 when it comes to ZFS. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
