On 07 January, 2007 - Tomas Ögren sent me these 1,0K bytes:

> On 05 January, 2007 - Tomas Ögren sent me these 3,3K bytes:
> 
> > > These numbers come from the last ::kmastat you ran before reducing the
> > > DNLC size.  Note below that much of this space is still consumed by
> > > these caches, even after the DNLC has dropped it references.  This is
> > > largely due to fragmentation in the caches.
> > 
> > I can continue to do plots/dumps of these metrics.. I'll try locking in
> > 200k entries or so and see what happens..
> 
> http://www.acc.umu.se/~stric/tmp/dnlc-plot2.png

Updated.

> This is after 1.5 day.. X axis is "kinda" minutes with a scaling error
> of 1.5-2.. Both spikes are from around when backups run, which isn't too
> surprising.. Does seem to be some fragmentation, yes..

And now it got another spike which killed it.. Backing off on the
"forcing dnlc" practice right now.. Seems like some fragmentation issues
has to be solved before that's a viable option..

/Tomas
-- 
Tomas Ögren, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~stric/
|- Student at Computing Science, University of Umeå
`- Sysadmin at {cs,acc}.umu.se
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to