Hello Jason, Wednesday, January 3, 2007, 11:11:31 PM, you wrote:
JJWW> Hi Richard, JJWW> Hmm....that's interesting. I wonder if its worth benchmarking RAIDZ2 JJWW> if those are the results you're getting. The testing is to see the JJWW> performance gain we might get for MySQL moving off the FLX210 to an JJWW> active/passive pair of X4500s. Was hoping with that many SATA disks JJWW> RAIDZ2 would provide a nice safety net. Well, you weren't thinking about one big raidz2 group? To get more performance you can create one pool with many smaller raidz2 groups - that way your worst case read performance should increase approximately N times where N is number of raidz-2 groups. However keep in mind that write performance should be really good with raidz2. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
