OK,

But lets get back to the original question.

Does ZFS provide you with less features than UFS does on one LUN from a SAN 
(i.e is it less stable).

>ZFS on the contrary checks every block it reads and is able to find the
>mirror
>or reconstruct the data in a raidz config.
>Therefore ZFS uses only valid data and is able to repair the data blocks
>automatically.
>This is not possible in a traditional filesystem/volume manager
>configuration.

The above is fine. If I have two LUNs. But my original question was if I only 
have one LUN. 

What about kernel panics from ZFS if for instance access to one controller goes 
away for a few seconds or minutes. Normally UFS would just sit there and warn I 
have lost access to the controller. Then when the controller returns, after a 
short period, the warnings go away and the LUN continues to operate. The admin 
can then research further into why the controller went away. With ZFS, the 
above will panic the system and possibly cause other coruption  on other LUNs 
due to this panic? I believe this was discussed in other threads? I also 
believe there is a bug filed against this? If so when should we expect this bug 
to be fixed?


My understanding of ZFS is that it functions better in an environment where we 
have JBODs attached to the hosts. This way ZFS takes care of all of the 
redundancy? But what about SAN enviroments where customers have spend big money 
to invest in storage. I know of one instance where a customer has a growing 
need for more storage space. There environemt uses many inodes. Due to the UFS 
inode limitation, when creating LUNs over one TB, they would have to quadrulpe 
the about of storage usesd in there SAN in order to hold all of the files. A 
possible solution to this inode issue would be ZFS. However they have 
experienced kernel panics in there environment when a controller dropped of 
line.

Any body have a solution to this?

Shawn
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to