Hello Jeb,

Tuesday, December 12, 2006, 6:04:36 PM, you wrote:

JC> I updated to Sol10u3 last night, and I'm still seeing different
JC> differences between "du -h" and "ls -h".

JC> "du" seems to take into account raidz and compression -- if this is 
correct, please let me know.

JC> It makes sense that "du" reports actual disk usage, but this
JC> makes some scripts I wrote very broken (need real sizes of files
JC> in a directory to be able to put them on dvd isos).

JC> Sol10u3 on 3 disk RaidZ:
JC> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/burnout/2006-11-30]$ ls -lh JMS-data-1-2006-11-30.iso
JC> -rw-r--r-- 1 splus splus 3.5G Dec  1 10:15 JMS-data-1-2006-11-30.iso
JC> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/burnout/2006-11-30]$ du -hs JMS-data-1-2006-11-30.iso
JC> 5.2G    JMS-data-1-2006-11-30.iso

After upgrade you did actually re-create your raid-z pool, right?

-- 
Best regards,
 Robert                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to