Hello Richard, Wednesday, November 1, 2006, 11:36:14 PM, you wrote:
REP> Adam Leventhal wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:00:43PM -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote: >>> Lets say server A has the pool with NFS shared, or iSCSI shared, >>> volumes. Server A exports the pool or goes down. Server B imports the pool. >>> >>> Which clients would still be active on the filesystem(s)? The ones that >>> were mounting it when it was on Server A? >> >> Clients would need to explicitly change the server they're contacting unless >> that new server also took over the IP address, hostname, etc. REP> Does this imply that using Sun Cluster, which transfers (logical) IP REP> addresses, would easily provide an HA-iSCSI service? I'll admit that REP> I still don't understand the iSCSI naming and security schemes. I haven't played with iSCSI (yet) but is really hostname necessary? What else? Putting zpool under SC with an IP address in SC group should be enough I hope - or maybe not? -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
