Folks, When using sharenfs, do I really need to NFS export the parent zfs filesystem *and* all of its children? For example, if I have /zfshome /zfshome/user1 /zfshome/user1+n it seems to me like I need to mount each of these exported filesystems individually on the NFS client. This scheme doesn't seem optimal. If I have tens of thousands of users, each with their own little ZFS filesystem (necessary because ZFS doesn't do user-based quotas), I don't want to NFS mount all of these filesystems on a single node. Also, on Linux, since anonymous filesystems like NFS do not have a block device associated with them I can only have 255 of them mounted on a single host.
Am I missing something? -- Robert Petkus Brookhaven National Laboratory Physics Dept. - Bldg. 510A Upton, New York 11973 http://www.bnl.gov/RHIC http://www.acf.bnl.gov _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
