I'm doing a putback onto my local workstation, watching the disk
activity with "zpool iostat", when I start to notice something
quite strange...

zpool iostat 1
              capacity     operations    bandwidth
pool         used  avail   read  write   read  write
----------  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      4  4.64K  39.1K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0    118      0  1.16M
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
...
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0    113  2.47K  1.28M
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0  3.96K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0  3.96K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0  3.96K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      4      0   360K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0    109      0   699K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0    137      0  3.26M
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      2      0   380K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0   127K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0   127K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      2      0  71.3K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0    113   1013   682K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0  3.96K
biscuit     3.39G   185G      0      0      0      0

It claims there are no read operations but the read
bandwidth is non-zero.  Is this true or a bug?  If
it is true, then how is it possible?  Does it count
in-core cache reads as bandwidth?

Something I do miss, in comparison to iostat and
friends is the occasional new "header" line, telling
me what each column means.  Can zpool be extended to
report this every n lines (with default to 0 being
the current behaviour) ?

Darren

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to