On Sep 30, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Torrey McMahon wrote:

What about the case of an iSCSI LUN?  Does this change?  I get that while local to the system a read from a mirror versus a RAIDZ pool is desirable, but would an IP network introduce enough latency that the difference is negligible?  And wouldn't I get better aggregate performance across more spindles for multiple iSCSI LUNs than trying to create a mirror pair for each individual iSCSI LUN? 

I hate to say but ... it depends. How fast is the iSCSI connection. There are too many variables in the stack - network, array, backend target, iSCSI stack, etc. - to make a generalization.


Hrm... I hate to overload this particular thread with details on this question.  Perhaps I should lob in another e-mail?  I'm essentially intending to build a backend iSCSI target using Solaris x86 w/ZFS on commodity hardware.  Front-end is a heterogenous group of VMware instances running on Linux physical hosts.

I'll open up a separate thread, but essentially I'm trying to get scalable performance out of the backend.  It doesn't have to be blazing fast, but it would be great if I could get close to a single spindle of speed for each VM up to say about 10 or even 20 VMs.



--Randy

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to