On September 21, 2006 10:48:34 AM +0200 Jakob Praher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
On September 18, 2006 5:45:08 PM +0200 Jakob Praher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BUT if we are at discussing NFS for distributed stroage: What are your
guys performance data for NFSv4 as a storage node. How well does the
current Solaris NFSv4 stack interoperate with the Linux stack?
Would you go for that?
My last knowledge of Linux NFSv4 vs. Solaris NFSv4 is that they don't
interoperate. This was about a year ago. I've always had to force
Linux to v3.
Are there any good heartbeat
control apps for Solaris out there?
Sun Cluster and Veritas VCS come to mind. I use ucarp for a homegrown
solution.
JBOD, SPoF - what are these things?
Wow. Just a Bunch of Disks. Single Point of Failure.
SMF is the init.d replacement of solaris, right? What would that look
like. What would SMF do, but restart your app if it fails? Would you like
to have a background task running instead of kicking it on with cron?
<http://opensolaris.org/os/community/smf/>
-frank
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
