On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 09:41:58AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Richard, when I talk about cheap JBOD I think about home users/small
> >servers/small companies. I guess you can sell 100 X4500 and at the same
> >time 1000 (or even more) cheap JBODs to the small companies which for sure
> >will not buy the big boxes. Yes, I know, you earn more selling
> >X4500. But what do you think, how Linux found its way to data centers
> >and become important player in OS space ? Through home users/enthusiasts 
> >who
> >become familiar with it and then started using the familiar things in
> >their job. 
> 
> But Linux isn't a hardware vendor and doesn't make cheap JBOD or 
> multipack for the home user.

Linux is used as a symbol.

> So I don't see how we get from "Sun should make cheap home user JBOD" 
> (which BTW we don't really have the channel to sell for anyway) to "but 
> Linux dominated this way".

"Home user" = tech/geek/enthusiasts who is an admin in job

[ Linux ]
"Home user" is using linux at home and is satisfied with it. He/she then goes 
to job and says
"Let's install/use it on less important servers". He/she (and
management) is again satisfied with it. So lets use it at more important
servers ... etc.

[ ZFS ]
"Home user" is using ZFS (Solaris) at home (remember easiness and even WEB
interface to ZFS operations !,) to keep photos, musics, etc. and is satisfied 
with it.
He/she the goes to his/her job and says "I use for a while a fantastic
filesystem". Lets use it on less important servers". Ok. Later on "Works ok.
Let's use on more important ....". Etc...

Yes, I know, a bit naive. But remember that not only Linux spreads this
way but also Solaris as well. I guess most of downloaded Solaris CD/DVD
are for x86. You as a company "attack" at high end/midrange level. Let
users/admins/fans "attack" at lower end level.


przemol
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to