Hello Roch,

Thursday, August 24, 2006, 3:37:34 PM, you wrote:


R> So this is the interesting data , right ?


R>   1. 3510, RAID-10 using 24 disks from two enclosures, random
R>      optimization, 32KB stripe width, write-back, one LUN

R>   1.1 filebench/varmail for 60s

R>      a. ZFS on top of LUN, atime=off

R>       IO Summary:      490054 ops 8101.6 ops/s, (1246/1247 r/w) 
R> 39.9mb/s,    291us cpu/op,   6.1ms latency




R>   2. 3510, 2x (4x RAID-0(3disks)), 32KB stripe width,
R>      random optimization, write back. 4 R0 groups are in one enclosure
R>      and assigned to primary controller then another 4 R0 groups are in 
other enclosure
R>      and assigned to secondary controller. Then RAID-10 is created with
R>      mirror groups between controllers. 24x disks total as in #1.


R>    2.1 filebench/varmail 60s

R>      a. ZFS RAID-10, atime=off

R>       IO Summary:      379284 ops 6273.4 ops/s, (965/965 r/w) 
R> 30.9mb/s,    314us cpu/op,   8.0ms latency


R> Have you tried 1M stripes spacially in case 2 ?

R> -r

I did try with 128KB and 256KB stripe width - the same results
(difference less than 5%).

I haven't tested 1MB 'coz maximum for 3510 is 256KB.



-- 
Best regards,
 Robert                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to