On 8/23/06, Arlina Goce-Capiral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need help on this and don't know what to give to customer.
System is V40z running Solaris 10 x86 and customer is trying to create 3
disks as Raidz. After creating the pool,
looking at the disk space and configuration, he thinks that this is not
raidz pool but rather
stripes. THis is what exactly he told me so i'm not sure if this makes
sense to all of you.
Any assistance and help is greatly appreciated.
THank you in advance,
Arlina
NOTE: Please email me directly as i'm not on this alias.
Below are more informations.
=================
Command used:
# zpool create pool raidz c1t2d0 c1t3d0 c1t4d0
From the format command:
0. c1t0d0 <DEFAULT cyl 8921 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63>
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci17c2,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0
1. c1t2d0 <FUJITSU-MAT3073NC-0104-68.49GB>
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci17c2,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0
2. c1t3d0 <FUJITSU-MAT3073NC-0104-68.49GB>
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci17c2,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0
3. c1t4d0 <FUJITSU-MAT3073NC-0104-68.49GB>
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci17c2,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0
The pool status:
# zpool status
pool: pool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
this right here shows its a raidz pool, there is a bug in update 2
that makes new pools show up with the wrong availible disk space, as
he adds files to the pool, it will fix it self, i beleve teh fix is
slated to go into update 3.
NAME STATE (B READ WRITE CKSUM
pool ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
James Dickens
uadmin.blogspot.com
errors: No known data errors
The df -k output of te newly created pool as raidz.
# df -k
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on
pool 210567168 49 210567033 1% /pool
I can create a file that is large as the
stripe of the 3 disks. So the information reported is correct. Also,
if I pull a disk out, the whole zpool fails! There is no degraded
pools, it just fails.
===========================================
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
