Just updating the discussion with some email chains. After more digging, this does not appear to be a version 2 or 3 replicatiion issues. I believe it to be an invalid named snapshot that causes zpool and zfs commands to core.
Tim mentioned it may be similiar to bug 6450219. I agree it seems similiar to 6450219, but I'm not so sure it's the same as the related bug of 6446512. At least the description of "...mistakenly trying to copy a file or directory..." I do not believe to apply in this case. However, I'm still testing things so it very well may produce the same error. -Shane -------------- To: Tim Foster , Eric Schrock Date: Aug 22, 2006 10:37 AM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Issue with zfs snapshot replication from version2 to version3 pool. Looks like the problem is that 'zfs recieve' will accept invalid snapshot names. In this case two @ signs This causes most other zfs and zpool commands that look up the snapshot object type to core dump. Reproduced on x64 Build44 system with the following command. "zfs send t0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | zfs recv t1/fs0@@snashot_in" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/] $ zfs list -r t1 internal error: Invalid argument Abort(coredump) dtrace output .... 1 51980 zfs_ioc_objset_stats:entry t1 1 51981 zfs_ioc_objset_stats:return 0 1 51980 zfs_ioc_objset_stats:entry t1/fs0 1 51981 zfs_ioc_objset_stats:return 0 1 51980 zfs_ioc_objset_stats:entry t1/fs0 1 51981 zfs_ioc_objset_stats:return 0 1 51980 zfs_ioc_objset_stats:entry t1/fs0@@snashot_in 1 51981 zfs_ioc_objset_stats:return 22 .... This may need to be filed as a bug again zfs recv. Thank you for your time, -Shane ---------------------------- From: Tim Foster To: shane milton Cc: Eric Schrock Date: Aug 22, 2006 10:56 AM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Issue with zfs snapshot replication from version2 to version3 pool. Hi Shane, On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 10:37 -0400, shane milton wrote: > Looks like the problem is that 'zfs recieve' will accept invalid > snapshot names. In this case two @ signs > This causes most other zfs and zpool commands that look up the > snapshot object type to core dump. Thanks for that! I believe this is the same as http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6450219 (but I'm open to corrections :-) cheers, tim This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
