One problem with this approach is that software expects /var/mail to be full of files, not directories, for each user. I don't think you can get the right semantics out of ZFS for this yet (loopback mounting a file comes to mind, but breaks down if something tries to delete the user's mailbox when it goes empty). This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
- [zfs-discuss] Re: user quotas vs filesystem quotas? Anton B. Rang
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: user quotas vs filesystem ... Richard Elling - PAE
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: user quotas vs filesys... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: user quotas vs fil... Frank Cusack
- [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: user quotas vs fi... Anton B. Rang
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: user quota... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: user ... Frank Cusack
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: u... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: user quotas vs fil... Peter Bortas
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: user quotas vs... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: user quotas vs... Richard Elling - PAE