mario heimel writes:
 > Hi.
 > 
 > i am very interested in ZFS compression on vs off tests maybe you can run 
 > another one with the 3510.
 > 
 > i have seen a slightly benefit with compression on in the following test 
 > (also with high system load):
 > S10U2
 > v880 8xcore 16Ggb ram
 > (only six internal disks at this moment, i wait for the san luns -;)
 > 
 > filebench/varmail test with default parameter and run for 60 seconds
 > 
 > zpool create lzp raidz c0t2d0 c0t3d0 c0t4d0 c0t5d0
 > 
 > ZFS compression on
 > IO Summary:      284072 ops 4688.6 ops/s, (721/722 r/w)  24.2mb/s,    544us 
 > cpu/op,  10.2ms latency
 > IO Summary:      295985 ops 4887.7 ops/s, (752/752 r/w)  25.2mb/s,    539us 
 > cpu/op,   9.8ms latency
 > IO Summary:      337249 ops 5568.1 ops/s, (857/857 r/w)  28.5mb/s,    529us 
 > cpu/op,   8.6ms latency
 > IO Summary:      306231 ops 5055.1 ops/s, (778/778 r/w)  25.9mb/s,    531us 
 > cpu/op,   9.4ms latency
 > 
 > 
 > ZFS compression off
 > IO Summary:      284828 ops 4701.8 ops/s, (723/724 r/w)  24.0mb/s,    553us 
 > cpu/op,  10.2ms latency
 > IO Summary:      276570 ops 4565.5 ops/s, (702/703 r/w)  23.3mb/s,    543us 
 > cpu/op,  10.5ms latency
 > IO Summary:      276570 ops 4565.5 ops/s, (702/703 r/w)  23.3mb/s,    543us 
 > cpu/op,  10.5ms latency
 > IO Summary:      264656 ops 4370.3 ops/s, (672/673 r/w)  22.1mb/s,    546us 
 > cpu/op,  11.1ms latency
 > IO Summary:      264656 ops 4370.3 ops/s, (672/673 r/w)  22.1mb/s,    546us 
 > cpu/op,  11.1ms latency
 > 
 > 
 > test under heavy avg. system load 9
 > 
 > compression on
 > IO Summary:      285405 ops 4701.3 ops/s, (723/724 r/w)  22.9mb/s,   5370us 
 > cpu/op,  10.1ms latency
 > IO Summary:      285946 ops 4719.5 ops/s, (726/726 r/w)  23.3mb/s,   5342us 
 > cpu/op,  10.0ms latency
 > IO Summary:      307347 ops 5074.4 ops/s, (781/781 r/w)  24.6mb/s,   4964us 
 > cpu/op,   9.3ms latency
 > IO Summary:      271030 ops 4472.6 ops/s, (688/688 r/w)  22.1mb/s,   5650us 
 > cpu/op,  10.5ms latency
 > 
 > compression off
 > IO Summary:      277434 ops 4579.8 ops/s, (705/705 r/w)  22.6mb/s,   5520us 
 > cpu/op,  10.4ms latency
 > IO Summary:      259470 ops 4283.9 ops/s, (659/659 r/w)  21.2mb/s,   5913us 
 > cpu/op,  11.2ms latency
 > IO Summary:      272979 ops 4506.2 ops/s, (693/693 r/w)  22.0mb/s,   5601us 
 > cpu/op,  10.4ms latency
 > IO Summary:      271089 ops 4475.8 ops/s, (689/689 r/w)  22.2mb/s,   5644us 
 > cpu/op,  10.6ms latency
 >  
 >  
 > This message posted from opensolaris.org
 > _______________________________________________
 > zfs-discuss mailing list
 > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Beware that filebench creates zero-filled files which
compress rather well. YMMV.

-r

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to