Hello Pierre, Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 4:51:20 PM, you wrote:
PK> Thanks for your answer Eric! PK> I don't see any problem mounting a filesystem under 'legacy' PK> options as long as i can have the freedom of ZFS features by being PK> able to add/remove/play around with disks really! PK> I tested the 'zfs mount -a' and of course my /var/log[b]/test[/b] PK> became visible and my ZONES (playing a little there as well). PK> 1, What kind draw backs are there to have a filesystem mounted as 'legacy' ? PK> 2, What kind of 'features' of ZFS will remain ? legacy only means that ZFS won't mount/umount these file systems and you should manage them manually or via /etc/vfstab. Nothing else. There's one drawback when using legacy mountpoints - when you move a pool of disks to different server then you also have to copy proper vfstab entries - but it's not a problem in your case. Other than that lagacy mountpoint do not impose any restrictions, etc. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
