Hello eric,

Thursday, July 27, 2006, 4:34:16 AM, you wrote:
ek> Robert Milkowski wrote:

>>Hello George,
>>
>>Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 7:27:04 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>GW> Additionally, I've just putback the latest feature set and bugfixes 
>>GW> which will be part of s10u3_03. There were some additional performance
>>GW> fixes which may really benefit plus it will provide hot spares support.
>>GW> Once this build is available I would highly recommend that you guys take
>>GW> it for a spin (works great on Thumper).
>>
>>I guess patches will be released first (or later).
>>Can you give actual BUG IDs especially those related to performance?
>>
>>
>>  
>>
ek> For U3, these are the performance fixes:
ek> 6424554 full block re-writes need not read data in
ek> 6440499 zil should avoid txg_wait_synced() and use dmu_sync() to issue
ek> parallelIOs when fsyncing
ek> 6447377 ZFS prefetch is inconsistant
ek> 6373978 want to take lots of snapshots quickly ('zfs snapshot -r')

ek> you could perhaps include these two as well:
ek> 4034947 anon_swap_adjust() should call kmem_reap() if availrmem is low.
ek> 6416482 filebench oltp workload hangs in zfs

ok, thank you.
Do you know if patches for S10 will be released before U3?

ek> There won't be anything in U3 that isn't already in nevada...

I know that :)


-- 
Best regards,
 Robert                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to