Robert Milkowski writes:
> Hello zfs-discuss,
>
> What would you rather propose for ZFS+ORACLE - zvols or just files
> from the performance standpoint?
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://milek.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Not sure to what extent this would suffer from this:
Synopsis: large writes to zvol synchs too much, better cut down a little
Number: 6428639
At first glance, I would think it's not in the picture as
oracle won't issue those jumbo sized writes.
Right now, I've seen more focus of getting ZFS/Oracle
working well with files because that's what we see as the
demand. But given that Oracle is ready to deal with raw and that
files bring a extra set of constraints I would think that
zvol is best. Plus you seem to have an early adopter frame
of mind ;-)
-r
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
