David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It does, as you say, take up another whole parity disk (or two in your > raidz2 case). And requires add-ons to be in units bigger than just > one drive.
I've seen people wondering if ZFS was a scam because the claims just seemed too good to be true. Given that ZFS *is* really great, I don't think it would hurt to prominently advertise limitations like this one it would probably benefit credibility considerably, and it's a real consideration for anyone who's doing RAID-Z. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
