> >> Why aren't you using amanda or something else that uses >> tar as the means by which you do a backup? > > Using something like tar to take a backup forgoes the ability to do things > like the clever incremental backups that ZFS can achieve though; e.g. only > backing the few blocks that have changed in a very large file rather than > the whole file regardless. If 'zfs send' doesn't do something we need to fix > it rather than avoid it, IMO. >
For now I am a little stuck with few options. Amanda and Bacula and things like that that rely on tar. Good old trusty crusty tar. At this point I expect Mr. Schilling to come wading in with an observation or two. Dennis _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
