>Darren J Moffat wrote: > >> Steven Sim wrote: >> >>> Casper; >>> >>> Does this mean it would be a good practice to say increase the amount >>> of memory and/or swap space we usually recommend if the customer >>> intends to use ZFS very heavily? >> >> >> ZFS doesn't necessarily use more memory (physical or virtual) than UFS >> it needs more VM *address space* (not the same as more VM) hence the >> 64 bit processor. >> > offtopic query : > How can ZFS require more VM address space but not more VM ?
You mean, not more physical memory? Casper _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
