On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 06:43:59PM +0800, Darren Reed wrote: > > Well, I use "df -kl", but commands such as "df" will work just > the same if I use "." or "/" or "/dev/dsk/c0t3d0s0" (and all three > are the same.) > > Yes, arguably I am cut-past'ing the wrong part of the output.. > > I suppose what I'm questioning is, whether or not there is any > real danger in zfs converting /usr/local to usr/local and then > trying to do a delete of the filesystem usr/local. I suppose this > could mounted in /opt/local and be not what I wanted... > > But in the case where the ZFS mountpoint is the ZFS filesystem > name (plus a leading /), why not allow both names to mean the same?
A better solution would be fixing this RFE: 6260523 want 'zfs list <path>' Which could also be expanded to other zfs(1M) commands. This would do the statvfs()/getmntany() to find the associated zfs dataset, regardless of whether it matches the mountpoint or not. - Eric -- Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
