On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:41:50AM -0600, Neil Perrin wrote: > >Why is this option available then? (Yes, that's a loaded question.) > > I wouldn't call it an option, but an internal debugging switch that I > originally added to allow progress when initially integrating the ZIL. > As Roch says it really shouldn't be ever set (as it does negate POSIX > synchronous semantics). Nor should it be mentioned to a customer. > In fact I'm inclined to now remove it - however it does still have a use > as it helped root cause this problem.
Rename it to "zil_disable_danger_will_robinson" :) _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
