Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for.

Ed Plese


On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 10:09:35AM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
> No, but this is a known issue.  See:
> 
> 6431277 want filesystem-only quotas
> 
> - Eric
> 
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:58:25AM -0500, Ed Plese wrote:
> > It seems by design that ZFS counts the space used by snapshots towards
> > the filesystem quotas.  I can see many cases where this would be the
> > desired behavior, but for the common case of using one filesystem per
> > user home directory in combination with quotas and snapshots, this
> > doesn't seem to work too well.
> > 
> > If the user hits their quota, there seems to be no way for the user to
> > recover space assuming the fairly common case where they have one or
> > more snapshots from while their filesystem was fairly full.  Instead
> > they'd need to have an administrator either increase their quota (which
> > seems to defeat the purpose of the quotas), or destroy all of their
> > snapshots (which seems to defeat the purpose of using the snapshots for
> > any sort of backup mechanism).
> > 
> > Is there any way to work around this with the quota and snapshot
> > mechanisms built into ZFS?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Ed Plese
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > zfs-discuss mailing list
> > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> 
> --
> Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development       http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to