On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:10:56AM -0700, Andrzej Butkiewicz wrote: > I suppose that could be work on this way: zfs receive a command to > write part of the block, e.g. last 8kB in 32kB block. Next, instead > that read-modify-write we write modify information into the cache and > wait for next modification of this block. If any next write-command > will fill all parts of the block we will could write whole block > without reading it.
Yep, that pretty much describes this bug: 5035516 Overwrites should not require synchronous reads --matt _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss