On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:47, Haik Aftandilian wrote:
> Technically, this bug should not be marked as fixed. It should be closed
> as a dupe or just closed as "will not fix" with a comment indicating it
> was fixed by 6410698.
In past cases like this, I was told to close it as "unreproduceable"
rather than "will not fix" (again with a note indicating the bug which
probably fixed it..)
- Bill
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
