On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:18:33AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote: > > This implies that the differences on disk are sufficient that the zpool > upgrade stuff wouldn't cut it. Right ? That is there was no way to turn > an existing raidz1 into a raidz2.
Yes, that is correct. > Is there a new version for this or is that not needed since it is at the > vdev layer ? It is a new version, since 'nparity' is stored as part of the label, and we must prevent old versions from trying to naively open it as a normal "raidz" vdev. > Just curious (mainly because I'm currently using version "3" for > zfs-crypto :-)). This week we'll putback version 3, which will include double parity RAID-Z, hot spares, and improved RAID-Z accounting. > I assume the on disk format document will be updated too. Yes. - Eric -- Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
