On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:43:05AM -0700, Marion Hakanson wrote: > Interesting discussion. I've often been impressed at how NetApp-like > the overal ZFS feature-set is (implies that I like NetApp's). Is it > verboten to compare ZFS to NetApp? I hope not....
It's a public list, you can do the comparison if you like :) Here's what I think: Solaris is a general purpose OS, as such it has scheduling facilities (cron(1M), at(1)) and what not, so it is tempting to say that we need only make it easy to build this kind of facility and much more. And for me better time formatting is a huge part of this (and, to answer the question, like what the date(1) supports, but I'd also like raw time in seconds/microseconds since the epoch). Now, it may be that we really should offer this functinality out of the box, with no scripting being required. Being neither in the ZFS team nor in Marketing I can't say what is planned, if anything. I imagine that Marketing would have some input on this, if they haven't already; and your input may impact what Marketing has to say on this, so keep it coming. Nico -- _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
