On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +0000, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote: > On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528 > > < > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$ > > > > > > > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg- > > utils > > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX > > Identifier to add. > > thanks for doing this! > > > The doubt concerns those script : > > makePackage > > opkg-build > > opkg-buildpackage > > opkg-compare-indexes > > opkg-diff > > opkg-extract-file > > opkg-graph-deps > > opkg-list-fields > > opkg-make-index > > opkg-show-deps > > opkg-unbuild > > opkg-update-index > > > > What license do you want them to carry ? > > Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris > Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the > thread). > > My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that > have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license > the rest as GPLv2+ too.
I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was part of handhelds.org. I did modify things quite a bit during the import. handhelds.org's CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from 20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2). I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
