On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 05:20, Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de> wrote: > > That's a good start. For a oe-core packagegroup > > I do not think a core-only packagegroup makes sense when the goal is to > completely replace busybox (and not just most apps while keeping a few > busybox apps installed).
But a "close enough" packagegroup in core would be a good starting point. > > I'd suggest dropping > > dnsmasq bridgeutils bindutils to keep it lean. > > The stated usecases are not "lean" but "replace all busybox commands > with the full versions". > > For that you need bind-utils (in oe-core) for DNS lookup. Good point well made. > > Also swap vim for something in core obviously. > > It is not obvious how to do that. > > What other vi implementation is in core? > Is there even any good non-busybox non-GUI editor in core? > Replacing busybox vi with ed would be a bad fit for the > stated usecases. > > There has to be some vi implementation installed, > and the "desktop command" implementation is vim. I thought we had some other editor in core, but can't see one. Worse case we still use busybox for its vi... :) Ross -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
