On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:35:10PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:58, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure we can blacklist busybox from the build at this time > > (hddimg requires initramfs that requires busybox) but instead only force > > remove it from the image and ensure it still builds. > > Don't build an image with a initramfs?
OK, so I've kicked things a bit harder again, and here's what I see as the (small) rub. $ git grep hddimg meta/conf/ meta/conf/machine/include/x86-base.inc:IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "hddimg" So yes, we can do a test with qemux86/qemux86-64 and documenting this in local.conf.sample is good (and a packagegroup that gives more 1:1 functionality is on my TODO list somewhere). But it's also true that we'll get people with "I can't remove busybox and I tried what it says" posts since blindly pulling in hddimg gives at least: ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'busybox-mdev' (but /home/trini/work/OE/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-framework_1.0.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) That's the point I want to make, after throwing out a quick test build dir. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
