I have toke the rpm file that was produced. I found the file under the build directory under tmp/work/imx8mq-strix-linux/x_media/1.0-r44/deploy-rpms/imx8mq/temp/x_media-1.0-r44.imx8mq.rpm. I used the following commands 7z x x_media-1.0-r44.imx8mq.rpm 7z x x_media-1.0-r44.imx8mq.cpio
The result from this gave me the file tree where I then could run file usr/lib/libx_media_1.0.so usr/lib/libx_media_1.0.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped So I believe that I have concluded that the rpm include the file that dnf is complaining about. I don't understand why dnf thinks that this dependency is not meet when it clearly is part of the package. I have added verbose flags to the dnf call but dose not give any more information. I am not sure how I can proceed to find out what I have done wrong. The recipe is a bit of a freak of nature because the binaries that I am packaging is actually built using another toolchain but it is for the same arch can dnf detect that? BR Måns Zigher Den tis 22 jan. 2019 kl 17:59 skrev Måns Zigher <mans.zig...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I am struggling with a recipe which more or less just downloads binaries > and creating a package. We have previously been using ipkg but now we have > switched to rpm in our builds. One of the binaries in the packages is a > library let's call it libx_media_1.0.so. This library is part of the > package that the recipe is producing. The library is placed under > /usr/lib/. When building the image I am getting the following error > > ERROR: base-image-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Could not invoke dnf. Command > ..... > ... > Error: > Problem: package packagegroup-x-media-1.0-r11.noarch requires x_media, > but none of the providers can be installed > - conflicting requests > - nothing provides libx_media_1.0.so()(64bit) needed by > x_media-1.0-r44.imx8mq > > ERROR: base-image-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Function failed: do_rootfs > > Here is the output from running the command file on the library > > usr/lib/libx_media_1.0.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, ARM aarch64, > version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped > > I have also verified that the library is part of the produced rpm so that > is not the issue. > > Dose anyone have any suggestion on how to debug this problem? Because I am > out of ideas > > BR > Måns Zigher >
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
