> For all future releases, forever? Committing to that would be foolish.
Nothing is forever, you know this at the best. Seemed/seems that Canon Lake (supposed to be Core 7, now it is Core 9. or Core 10, or One only knows... You name it) supposed to be out in Q3 2016, but INTEL did not reach yielding on 10nm EUV(L) yet... Even Moore's Law is not forever (which INTEL committed to FOREVER)!? Committing to that (Moore's Law), would be foolish (Present Time), after all. Don't you agree? ;-) I have all the rights to make mistakes... In lieu of above written by yourself! Don't you agree (after my comments)? > We have no plans to move from DNF to something else. Luckily Yocto is open source so if in a few years time a stable and > superior alternative to DNF appears and we move to it, you can continue to maintain the DNF recipes yourself. I must say, that here, in this paragraph, I read true Words of Wisdom. I would like to thank you for that. :-) Zoran _______ On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > On 24 August 2017 at 15:34, Zoran Stojsavljevic < > zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do you agree to continue keeping DNF package (in >> .../meta/recipe_devtools/) for handling of .rpm type of packages in the >> future releases of YOCTO (it is, after all, much better and more mature >> tool that smartpm)? >> > > For all future releases, forever? Committing to that would be foolish. > > We have no plans to move from DNF to something else. Luckily Yocto is > open source so if in a few years time a stable and superior alternative to > DNF appears and we move to it, you can continue to maintain the DNF recipes > yourself. > > Ross >
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
