On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 08:06 -0700, Armin Kuster wrote:
> include meta-python for AppArmor changes
>
> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com>
> ---
> conf/layer.conf | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
> index 0e524a1..0b066fd 100644
> --- a/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -9,8 +9,4 @@ BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "security"
> BBFILE_PATTERN_security = "^${LAYERDIR}/"
> BBFILE_PRIORITY_security = "6"
>
> -LAYERDEPENDS_security = "core openembedded-layer perl-layer"
> -LAYERDEPENDS_security += "${@bb.utils.contains("DISTRO_FEATURES",
> "x11", "gnome-layer xfce-layer", "", d)}"
> -LAYERDEPENDS_security += "${@bb.utils.contains("MACHINE_FEATURES",
> "tpm", "tpm-layer", "",d)}"
> -LAYERDEPENDS_security += "${@bb.utils.contains("MACHINE_FEATURES",
> "tpm2", "tpm-layer", "",d)}"
> -LAYERDEPENDS_security += "${@bb.utils.contains("MACHINE_FEATURES",
> "vtpm", "tpm-layer meta-filesystems", "",d)}"
> +LAYERDEPENDS_security = "core openembedded-layer perl-layer meta-
> python"
How does this affect recipes which depend on some of things in those
layers?
I suspect that using meta-security without those other layers now
results in a broken world build due to missing dependencies.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
