> On Oct 3, 2016 1:39 PM, "Trevor Woerner" <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Odd... even with this patch I'm still seeing sporadic failures :-(
On Mon 2016-10-03 @ 02:35:22 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> I guess you need to look at sognatures and see why its changing.
Actually, it's not that sporadic, simply doing:
$ bitbake -c clean core-image-minimal
$ bitbake core-image-minimal
shows the taskhash mismatch error repeatedly:
core-image-minimal-1.0-r0 do_image_rpi_sdimg: Taskhash mismatch
536a3bcf4ac29225841c369636b533ff versus 8fadff5d0ef51aa648ed359d5dd7f944
Or I could just perform clean builds in succession.
The reported hashes are always the same: from 536a3bc... to 8fadff5... This
mismatch happens _during_ the build, not between two subsequent builds.
I'm not sure how to compare hashes, every subsequent build produces the same
two hashes. The build always ends with:
tmp-glibc/stamps/raspberrypi2-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-minimal/1.0-r0.do_image_rpi_sdimg.8fadff5d0ef51aa648ed359d5dd7f944
tmp-glibc/stamps/raspberrypi2-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-minimal/1.0-r0.do_image_rpi_sdimg.sigdata.8fadff5d0ef51aa648ed359d5dd7f944
so a "bitbake-diffsigs -t ..." will always be blank.
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
