The fsl-image-minimal rootfs doesn't include those graphic packages by default, 
I think those packages are included by the dependency of new added packages.

You can run "bitbake -g fsl-image-minimal" to generate the dependence file and 
analysis how the unneeded packages are brought in.


Best Regards,

Zhenhua

From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On 
Behalf Of Leonardo Sandoval
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:19 PM
To: Tanasa Bogdan <bogdan.tan...@saabgroup.com>; 'yocto@yoctoproject.org' 
<yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [yocto] profiling tools on a T4240RDB board




El 08/24/2016 a las 04:01 AM, Tanasa Bogdan escribió:
Hi,

We are using the (freescale) linux yocto 1.6 on a T4240RDB board where we want 
to have "tools-profile" set in our local.conf file. When building the 
fsl-image-minimal we see that there are some packages that are graphics-related 
(like gtk+, pixbuf, etc..). The card does not have any graphics capabilities. 
Why does these packets install at all? Is it possible to have the profiling 
tools without any gtk dependencies? How the local.conf should look like?
I believe the image you are using include those graphic-related pkgs so that is 
why you are seeing them. You may redefine your image, at the end 
fsl-image-minimal is just an example that you can modify. Also you may have 
more answers  on a FSL (NXP?) channel/mailing-list



PS: These dependencies are there even when we choose tools-sdk in order to have 
gcc in the final image.

Thanks,
Bogdan.



-- 
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to