On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:30:25 +0100
Andrei Gherzan <and...@gherzan.ro> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:02:29PM +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
> > As recently discussed on the mailing list, bitbake now issues an
> > error when the task hash computed by the bitbake master differs
> > from the task hash computed by the bitbake worker. This usually
> > happens when the task hash depends on the date and time for some
> > reason.
> >
> > This affects IMAGE_CMD_rpi-sdimg and is fixed by excluding the
> > dependency on the current date and time from the command.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk>
> > ---
> > classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass
> > b/classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass index 3b4f13f..a8d83a3 100644
> > --- a/classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass
> > +++ b/classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass
> > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ SDIMG =
> > "${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.rpi-sdimg" FATPAYLOAD ?=
> > ""
> >
> > IMAGEDATESTAMP = "${@time.strftime('%Y.%m.%d',time.gmtime())}"
> > -IMAGE_CMD_rpi-sdimg[vardepsexclude] = "IMAGEDATESTAMP"
> > +IMAGE_CMD_rpi-sdimg[vardepsexclude] = "DATETIME"
> >
> > IMAGE_CMD_rpi-sdimg () {
>
> I can't seem to replicate this issue with currrent poky master. Any
> idea why? Maybe this got fixed in poky?
>
I must admit it's an issue I don't 100% understand. I'll try again
without this patch and see what happens.
Thanks,
Paul Barker
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
