Hi Ross, On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 14:20 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 17 May 2016 at 02:15, Andrew Jeffery <and...@aj.id.au> wrote: > > Is there a better way to work that might avoid these issues? > > Alternatively, should we start looking at reworking the > > runqemu/runqemu-internal scripts such that we don't have to patch > > them > > to support our use-case? If so, what sort of approach would the > > community be happy with? > > > Dig back a few weeks and you'll a RFC series by Robert Yang > refactoring runqemu for exactly this problem. I've not yet looked at > it myself but if you could see if that solves your problems then that > would be much appreciated.
Thanks for the pointer. Is this the patchset you're referring to? http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-March/118982.html A brief look suggests it might get us some of the way there, but I'll take a more detailed look in the next day or so. Andrew
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
