On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 6 April 2016 at 20:55, Ronald Oakes <rona...@brc2.com> wrote: >> >> For what it's worth, I may be able to work around this by using the >> Poky-Tiny distribution, which is closer to what I'll need for the >> minimalist system we need in the end. > > If you need a minimal system then you might want to look at oe-core from > git, which has musl support integrated. musl appears to be superiour to > uclibc and we'll be releasing 2.1 this month. There's a good chance that > uclibc will be removed from oe-core entirely for the 2.2 release as musl is > only slightly larger than uclibc but more capable.
You could also perhaps try setting DEFAULTTUNE to core2-64 instead of corei7-64. If your development system is able to run binaries compiled for core2 then the problem might just become hidden again. Out of interest, what is the CPU in your development system? > > Ross > > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
