On 2016-03-23 10:48, Jens Rehsack wrote:

Am 23.03.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Jens Rehsack <rehs...@gmail.com>:


Am 23.03.2016 um 10:09 schrieb Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com>:

On 2016-03-23 09:57, Jens Rehsack wrote:

Am 23.03.2016 um 09:40 schrieb Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com>:

On 2016-03-23 09:09, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2016-03-23 06:36, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
I hope this is the correct place to discuss this problem.  It
is all about a difference in behavior between a program built
using bitbake/OE (only OE-core is needed) vs building the program
on the target hardware itself.

I've been struggling with this problem since perl was upgraded
to version 5.22.  I'm working on Amanda (Advanced Maryland Archive
tool) which is written primarily in perl and uses swig interfaces
to access native C functions.  This code works great when using
the previous perl (5.20.x) but fails on all 32 bit targets with
perl 5.22

The interesting thing is that if I build Amanda on my target
directly (using SDK tools), it works perfectly even with perl
5.22, so it seems that there is some [subtle] difference between
building using bitbake/OE than when built on the self-hosted
target.  I've compared the builds and the only thing I could
find (from the output of configure) is a difference in sizeof(off_t)
Sadly, when I tried to adjust this in the OE build, it didn't
make any difference, but perhaps I didn't make this change
correctly or completely.

do you have largefile support turned on ? if you do then it might
be detecting it wrongly during configure since we cache it to a
non-largefile case

so try to add something like

EXTRA_OECONF += "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'largefile',
'ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=8', '', d)}"

while building perl or the affected program and see if that helps

Thanks for the idea, but that didn't help.  I also forced some CFLAGS
to match, in particular:
  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
but this didn't make any difference either.


On a whim I just tried a little experiment where I took the *.o files
from the perl subdirectory (where all the swig shims live) from a working
(self-hosted) build and moved them to my bitbake/OE build.  I then touched
all the *.o and *.lo files in the perl tree to force a relink. I then ran
% bitbake amanda -C compile && bitbake core-image-base
to my surprise, amanda works!  So the culprit lies somewhere within the
swig generated glue.  I've tried comparing these files before and I didn't
find anything other than cosmetic differences (mostly comments about the
name of the file processed, etc).  I've added this subtree to "results"
in my github layer in case someone can see what might be relevant.

Any ideas what might be different and make this swig generated glue fail?
Note that the swig interface files are rebuilt as part of the build process
and both bitbake/OE and self-hosted are using the same swig version.

I digged a bit through your layer (while my up2date scanner over meta-cpan
blocks my build chain :P) and realized that you use perl-5.20.0 as it was
in poky. A "simple" downgrade would be more reasonable ... if reason applys
here in general :)

In practice, I am doing that.  However, I want to understand why perl 5.22
breaks things and get it fixed.

I did a diff between your 5.20 and poky's 5.22 and realize some fixes applied
in 5.22 regarding library path's aren't applied in your copy. Maybe swig relies
on wrong library locations and when we know, we can fix.

So it's maybe not a 5.20 vs. 5.22 problem, it's maybe a weird swig setup 
problem.

When you fail on cross-build and succeed in target build, try to compare the
C files and includes (even swig libraries) used.

It smells more like a "wrong source" than a "perl problem" (and even when
I never would read any python thread, the same problem would likely occur
there, too ^^).

Which perl headers are used in your build? To dig down, more logs would
be reasonable ...

Everything comes from the same sources, same revisions, etc, as I'm using
either a bitbake/OE build or the embedded (self-hosted) version from the
same build plus SDK tools.

And your SDK does not include any host tools? Did you prove the intermediate
amanda build files (eg. generated by SWIG) for relicts from wrong source?
Did you check the logs which include directories had been used?

I give it a quick shot and got:

../../arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=compile 
arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc  -march=armv7-a -marm  -mthumb-interwork 
-mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=neon -mtune=cortex-a9 
--sysroot=/homes/sno/fsl-release-bsp/ornithologen-kann-man-mit-voegeln-eine-freude-machen/tmp/sysroots/curie
 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../config -I../../common-src -I../../common-src 
-I../../xfer-src -I../../gnulib -I../../ndmp-src 
-I/homes/sno/fsl-release-bsp/ornithologen-kann-man-mit-voegeln-eine-freude-machen/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib/perl-native/perl/5.22.1/CORE
   -fno-strict-aliasing -D_GNU_SOURCE -pthread 
-I/homes/sno/fsl-release-bsp/ornithologen-kann-man-mit-voegeln-eine-freude-machen/tmp/sysroots/curie/usr/include/glib-2.0
 
-I/homes/sno/fsl-release-bsp/ornithologen-kann-man-mit-voegeln-eine-freude-machen/tmp/sysroots/curie/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
 -DSWIG  -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -fipa-pta 
-ftree-partial-pre -ftree-loop-distribution -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -fg
cse-afte
r
-reload -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las  -fno-strict-aliasing  -c -o xferwrap.lo xferwrap.c

Do you see the 
"-I/homes/sno/fsl-release-bsp/ornithologen-kann-man-mit-voegeln-eine-freude-machen/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib/perl-native/perl/5.22.1/CORE"
 ?

Any further blames of perl-5.22? :)

I'm not sure what you are getting at here.  Indeed it is supposed to be
using perl-5.22.1 for everything.  The version 5.22.0 in meta-amanda layer
is just for testing and should not be used at the moment.

All of my comparisons and testing (see instructions in the README) are
for perl-5.22.1 only and in fact I've only been using the bits from bitbake/OE
and not building that any more (I found that it wasn't necessary - one only
needs to build amanda on the target)

Sorry for the confusion.


--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to