> On Jan 8, 2016, at 1:21 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > > > On 8 January 2016 at 09:09, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com > <mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com>> wrote: > For anyone else reading, I just gave this a test locally, and for context the > previous poky-tiny was using a tuned glibc and the rootfs came in at 1.5M. > > Finished my comparison builds: > > musl: > -rw-r--r-- 1 ross ross 731681 Jan 7 23:46 > core-image-minimal-qemux86-20160107234351.rootfs.cpio.gz > glibc: > -rw-r--r-- 1 ross ross 1569610 Jan 8 00:01 > core-image-minimal-qemux86-20160107235147.rootfs.cpio.gz > uclibc: > -rw-r--r-- 1 ross ross 669759 Jan 8 09:14 > core-image-minimal-qemux86-20160108090512.rootfs.cpio.gz > > So it's a slightly increase over uclibc, but by default poky-tiny uses glibc > so this is a massive win. In the greater scheme of things musl is trending > to be worth the increase over uclibc too. >
Thanks Ross for this info. I think it will be interesting to know the sizes of packages contributing to image from buildhistory if you have it lying around. musl has libpthread/libm etc. all bundled into single .so for simplicity reasons. I would like to get to bottom of the slight increase of musl over uclibc based system > Ross
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
