On 01/12/2015 09:40, "yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org on behalf of Martin
Jansa" <yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org on behalf of
martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>Another thing that just occurred to me though - apologies for not
>>raising it 
>>earlier - for the benefit of newer users it may be useful to explain
>>implications of the blacklisting. What I'd suggest is we put a line
>>after the 
>>reason on the recipe detail page saying "This means that the recipe will
>>not 
>>be buildable until the PNBLACKLIST value is cleared and the issue that
>>caused 
>>it to be added has been fixed or worked around." (Just on the recipe
>>detail 
>>page - not in the popup.)
>>Does that sound OK?
>
>Maybe some more information how to clear PNBLACKLIST (people often don't
>know that they can just set it to empty value in their bbappend or even
>distro/local config).

I think explaining what blacklisting means, its implications and how to
clear it is an excellent idea, but it seems there is quite a lot to say,
and the layer index itself might not be the best place to show it all. So
what about adding all this to the documentation, then link to it from the
layer index? The recipe details page would then look like the attached
image. 

Alex, sorry for nitpicking: using the .label-inverse class means that the
label in the h1 of the recipe details page also hovers. Only labels with a
tooltip should hover, so maybe we should go back to the extra class, or
just qualify the hover styles so that they only apply to .label-inverse
inside tables (td > .label-inverse:hover). Apologies: I should have picked
this up before you submitted the patch.

Cheers

Belén

>
>-- 
>Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com

-- 
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to